
Plane is an open-source project management tool for issues, sprints (cycles), and product roadmaps.
Read moreThe best open source alternative to Linear is Plane. If that doesn't suit you, we've compiled a ranked list of open source Linear alternatives to help you find a replacement.

Plane is an open-source project management tool for issues, sprints (cycles), and product roadmaps.
Read more
Beads is a Go CLI issue tracker built on Dolt that gives AI coding agents a graph-based memory instead of markdown TODO lists.
Read more
erxes is an open source Experience Operating System unifying marketing, sales, support, and operations in one platform.
Read moreLinear is cloud-only, with no self-hosted option at any price, so teams that need on-premise or air-gapped deployment have no path to run it themselves regardless of budget. Open-source issue trackers exist precisely to fill that gap.
Self-hosting keeps product roadmaps, internal discussions, and issue history off a third party's servers, which matters for teams with strict data residency or security requirements. It also means the tool can be extended or customized at the code level, something a closed SaaS product does not allow no matter how good its API is.
There's a migration angle too: issue history and workflows built up inside a closed tool over time are harder to export in full than data already sitting in a database you operate. Choosing a self-hosted tool from the start avoids that problem later.
Cost is a more direct factor as teams scale past a handful of engineers: Linear's per-seat billing applies to every member with edit access, while a self-hosted tracker's cost stays tied to server capacity regardless of how many people log in to update a ticket.
Decide whether you need a tool purpose-built for engineering issue tracking or a broader suite that also covers CRM, marketing, or support, since the tools in this category differ sharply on scope. Linear's appeal rests heavily on a fast, keyboard-driven interface, so check how each alternative handles that specifically rather than assuming feature parity means similar feel. Confirm sprint or cycle planning support if your team relies on it. Weigh how many other tools a platform aims to replace: fewer tools to run is convenient, but a broader platform also means more surface area to maintain. Finally, check self-hosting complexity and the infrastructure each option expects, along with how actively each project ships releases.
Plane markets itself directly as an open-source Jira, Linear, Monday, and ClickUp alternative, with sprints, docs, and triage inside one interface.
Erxes is broader in scope: an Experience Operating System aiming to replace HubSpot, Zendesk, Linear, and Wix, unifying marketing, sales, operations, and support in one platform.